Research That Informs Action

Our studies are designed for use. Each research process produces accessible evidence for local authorities, learning for communities & policy options for partners

Recent and ongoing areas of work include:

  1. Conflict and reconciliation analysis: District-level conflict mapping and documentation of community-based resolution systems, used to shape local peace strategies.
  2. Cross-border peace and early warning: Tracking conflict trends and cooperation opportunities across border areas to support joint responses.
  3. Economic inclusion and youth employment: Evidence on labor market barriers, enterprise performance, and equitable access to economic initiatives.

  1. Narratives and community resilience: Perception studies on violent extremism messaging and locally led storytelling for peace.
  2. Faith and governance: Research on the constructive role of religious actors in reconciliation, mediation, and social cohesion.
  3. Inclusion and equitable governance: Development of social inclusion benchmarks and analysis of discrimination in access to public institutions.

From evidence to dialogue

We convene structured engagements where:

  • Communities define priorities
  • Authorities respond to documented realities
  • Media use verified information
  • Civil society builds coalitions around shared evidence

  • This process creates practical accountability
    and strengthens public trust.

Capacity strengthening

We support:

  • District administrations to use data in planning and service delivery
  • Community groups to engage in policy processes
  • Media actors to report using verified local evidence
  • Civil society to sustain dialogue platforms

Knowledge products

Our outputs are designed for decision-making:

  • District governance and social trust studies
  • Inclusion and social cohesion indices
  • Policy briefs and analytical papers
  • Community perception surveys
  • Thematic evidence briefs

Our way of working

  • Locally led research teams
  • Long-term engagement, not short project cycles
  • Participatory methods that include excluded groups
  • Continuous feedback between data, dialogue, and reform